www.tamilar.org - The Portal for more than Seventy Million Tamil People
Sponsored By :: http://www.kuttyjapan.com Welcome to TAMILAR.ORG 'Siru Thuli, Peru Vellam' means 'Single drops makes an Ocean'
Web portal for Seventy Million Tamil Speaking Community.
Free Tamil Matrimonial
Guest Book
Contact Info
Site Info
Site Designed by
Ram Softs India
Site Hosted by
Kuttyjapan Web Services
Site Author
Raam Kumar Nadar
Site Sponsors
Srianth Fine Arts



Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project - Conceived in 19th century, completed in 21st century????
Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project - A brief Introduction

For More details visit Sethusamudram Ship Canal Blog

The Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project conceived more than a century ago is still in its embryonic stage.

The project was originally conceived in 1860 by the British Commander A.D. Taylor of the Indian Marines. Thereafter, almost once in every decade a committee or a prominent expert made a recommendation in favour of the construction of the canal. In 1955, for the first time since Independence, the Government of India constituted the Sethusamudram Project Committee under Sir Ramaswamy Mudaliyar to examine the feasibility and desirability of connecting the Gulf of Mannar with Palk Bay and its impact on the port of Tuticorin. The committee recommended that the canal project be linked to the Tuticorin Harbour Project and that both projects be undertaken simultaneously. The cost of the joint project was estimated at Rs 9.98 crore. The Sethusamudram Project Committee report was, however, put in cold storage. In 1963, the government sanctioned only the Tuticorin project.

The government's enthusiasm to set up committees did not wane. Successive committees revised the cost of the project upwards. In 1994, the Tamil Nadu government appointed the Pallavan Transport Consultancy Services Ltd in Chennai to appraise and revalidate a 1983 report. The new report, submitted in March 1996, further revised the project cost to Rs 760 crore for 31 feet draft.

Hope on the project was revived in January 1999 when Defence Minister George Fernandes announced that the government would complete the digging of the Sethu Samudram channel in three years. This was backed by the Prime Minister's assurance that his government was committed to the project. Indeed, the government took a concrete step towards the execution of the project when Union Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, in his Budget 2000-01, allocated Rs 4.8 crore for a feasibility study of the Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project. Recently, following a directive from the Union Ministry of Shipping, the Tuticorin Port Trust invited tenders for undertaking just such a feasibility-cum-environment study for the project.

The "Sethusamudram Ship Canal" project proposes linking the Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar on the east coast of India by creating a shipping canal through Rameswaram Island, which would provide a continuous navigable sea route around the Indian Peninsula. The total cost of the techno-economic viability and EIA study is expected to be around Rs 6 crore. The project involves digging a 44.9 nautical-mile long channel linking the Palk Strait with the Gulf of Mannar.

After the canal is constructed, the distance between Cape Comorin and Chennai would be reduced to 402 nautical miles from the present 755. Further, the canal would considerably reduce the distance between the east and the west coasts with travelling time coming down by 36 hours. It will also avoid circumnavigation of ships around Sri Lanka, thereby resulting in savings in fuel costs and standing charges associated with extra period of voyages. The canal would help make coastal shipping operations from the east coast to the west coast and vice-versa more competitive.

The greatest beneficiary of the project will be Tuticorin harbour, which has the potential to transform into a transhipment hub such as those in Singapore and Colombo. The project will also help in the development of the proposed 13 minor ports in Tamil Nadu.

On the flipside, the project is likely to face stiff opposition from fishermen and environmentalists (most of them funded by the NGOs who don't want to implement the project, since they are getting paid in $s and ús for that only), who have already raising their collective voice against it. The protests may not deter the government from going ahead with the project as the gains outweigh the losses.

FACT FILE
  • Ships from the east coast of India to the west coast have to circumnavigate Sri Lanka. This is because of a Sand Stone Reef called Adam's bridge, at Pamban, near Rameswaram, where the depth of the sea is hardly 11 feet.
  • In order to reduce the steaming distances and take advantage of navigation along the coast and within India's territorial waters, British Commander A.D. Taylor of the Indian Marines conceived, in 1860, a proposal for cutting a ship canal called the Sethusamudram Ship Canal through Rameswaram island, connecting the Gulf of Mannar with Palk Strait.
  • After Independence, the Indian government constituted the Sethusamudram Project Committee in 1955, with Sir Ramaswamy Mudaliyar as chairman. He pegged the initial capital outlay for the integrated Sethusamudram-cum-Tuticorin Port Scheme at Rs 998 lakh and contemplated a draft of 26 ft.
  • In 1963, Tuticorin Harbour Project was sanctioned but the government decided to include Sethusamudram Project for advance action.
  • In 1975, the Tuticorin Harbour Project was completed and the traffic exceeded the forecast made.
  • In January 1981, Ministry of Shipping and Transport (Port Wing) constituted a committee that estimated the cost of the project at Rs 282 crore.
  • In 1994, the Tamil Nadu government requested the Pallavan Transport Consultancy Services Ltd, Chennai, to appraise and revalidate a 1983 report as a result of which the latter submitted its report in March 1996. The cost estimates indicated in the report for:
    1. 30' draft Rs 685 crore.
    2. 31' draft Rs 760 crore.
    3. 35' draft Rs 1,200 crore.


    They added that it would be worthwhile to implement the project initially for 31 feet draft and increase it to 35 feet wherever the approach channels are deepened in Tuticorin and Haldia.
  • In 1999, Defence Minister George Fernandes announced that the government would complete the project in three years.

Those who oppose the Sethusamudram project should adduce scientific facts and should not go by "half-baked ideas" and "misconceived notions," N.K. Raghupathy, Chairman, Tuticorin Port Trust, said today. The Tuticorin Port Trust is the nodal agency for the project.

"When it was the people's wish from 1956 that the project should be implemented, some organisations of recent origin have been opposing the project. We don't know who fund such organisations. They have been spreading falsehood," Mr. Raghupathy regretted, talking to presspersons here.

There would be no dredging in the Gulf of Mannar as claimed by some environmental organisations, he clarified. The navigation route would be 20 km away from the 21 national marine parks.

For the Sethusamudram project a full-fledged environment impact assessment report was prepared by the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nagpur, before a techno-economic feasibility report was readied. The NEERI said if the proposed route (shown on the map) was taken there would not be any environment problem and that the 21 national marine parks would be safe.

The environment management plan prepared by the NEERI would be implemented in letter and in spirit.

Tracing the history of the project from 1956, Mr. Raghupathy said every time a committee was formed to review it and give recommendations. All the panels agreed on the technical feasibility but expressed reservations about the economic viability of the project. In the 1980s environment protection became an issue and an environment impact assessment report became necessary for huge projects involving the environment of the sea, the coast and flora and fauna.

The NEERI went into the issue of disturbances to mangroves at Muthupettai, wildlife and the bird sanctuary at Vedaranyam and concluded that the project would not affect these environmentally-sensitive areas. For, the flow of water current would not change.

Mr. Raghupathy also called for developing at least one of the major ports in the country into an international container transhipment port. Transhipment of containers was now done at the Colombo port. The Tuticorin port had been handling containers and last year it handled 2,54,000 containers. The Mumbai port handled 21 lakh containers last year. The Tuticorin port had links with ports in the United States and Europe, and Red Sea ports



Tamil Horoscope - 2010 Year Predictions for free Tamil Horoscope - 2009 Year Predictions for free
  • MESHAM RASI
  • RISHABAM RASI
  • MIDHUNAM RASI
  • KADAGAM RASI
  • SIMMAM RASI
  • KANNI RASI
  • THULAM RASI
  • VIRUCHIGAM RASI
  • DHANUSU RASI
  • MAKARAM RASI
  • KUMBAM RASI
  • MEENAM RASI
  • We are very much thankful to our sponsors.